BULL
Oh NO! Not that guy!
Staff Team
Founding Member
U.S. Marine Veteran
Donating Member
HFCOTM
Wiki Contributor
- Member ID
- #1079
- Messages
- 15,459
- Reactions
- 48,179
- Likes
- 402
- City
- Weld County
- State
- CO
- Country
- United States
- Vehicle
- MY16 M6 Challenger Hellcat
- HFCOTM
- View Images
For those of us who send their engine oil for analysis...
I've been sending in my engine oil on the HC since it was new. Some of this was silly curiosity, some of it was a belief that IF I ever sold the car, that the UOA would have value to the next owner and would add either some level of tangible value or at least an increased marketability. i.e., Yes the car has been "tracked", but here are the lab results of the engine to show that in fact, the engine is still solid and not self destructing.
But, in order to do the oil sample "correctly", you have to have run the engine for at least 20 minutes of load, and then additionally, perform a "clean catch" method of oil from the pan. This is as simple as removing the oil pan plug, allowing some measure of oil to flow out, and only then collect the oil sample into the sample tube.
The only problem with this is that, at least for me, I'm on my back under the car while it's only up on RaceRamps which don't allow for a bunch of room to move around. There's of course also the oil pan to collect the used oil, AND the oil is ~220F.
I feel like a knight of old playing siege on the castle and worrying about the hot oil coming down on me, which regrettably I have done once or twice, once or twice too many times.
===============================
Well wouldn't you just know it, Blackstone Labs sells this:
Vacuum Pump
Which is fine, except it doesn't address a couple of things, and introduces a change to the way I've been sampling already, and I didn't want to introduce a variable to my analysis trends. (It doesn't accomplish the "clean catch" method and also potentially allows for sampling on a cold engine)
Well as apposed to debating differences in sampling techniques with either myself or anyone else for that matter, I set off to do what any good eeeginear would do, test...
"Normal" "clean catch" sample method from oil pan drain:
Vacuum Pump on a hot engine:
Vacuum Pump on a cold engine:
Ignore the statement about "dropping the pan", I don't do this, I'm not sure where this statement comes from. When they called me to ask what the hell I was doing, in my explanation, I think they misinterpreted my comparison of "oil pan PLUG" versus "dipstick".
So there are differences, that much is clear, but they don't seem to be notable?? I'll let you decide for yourself if you think they are or not.
Much like the oil analysis themselves, I did this testing in sampling differences as much as not for an exercise in knowledge for myself versus trying to prove anything one way or another.
@Hellcatcfp
I've been sending in my engine oil on the HC since it was new. Some of this was silly curiosity, some of it was a belief that IF I ever sold the car, that the UOA would have value to the next owner and would add either some level of tangible value or at least an increased marketability. i.e., Yes the car has been "tracked", but here are the lab results of the engine to show that in fact, the engine is still solid and not self destructing.
But, in order to do the oil sample "correctly", you have to have run the engine for at least 20 minutes of load, and then additionally, perform a "clean catch" method of oil from the pan. This is as simple as removing the oil pan plug, allowing some measure of oil to flow out, and only then collect the oil sample into the sample tube.
The only problem with this is that, at least for me, I'm on my back under the car while it's only up on RaceRamps which don't allow for a bunch of room to move around. There's of course also the oil pan to collect the used oil, AND the oil is ~220F.
I feel like a knight of old playing siege on the castle and worrying about the hot oil coming down on me, which regrettably I have done once or twice, once or twice too many times.
===============================
Well wouldn't you just know it, Blackstone Labs sells this:
Vacuum Pump
Which is fine, except it doesn't address a couple of things, and introduces a change to the way I've been sampling already, and I didn't want to introduce a variable to my analysis trends. (It doesn't accomplish the "clean catch" method and also potentially allows for sampling on a cold engine)
Well as apposed to debating differences in sampling techniques with either myself or anyone else for that matter, I set off to do what any good eeeginear would do, test...
"Normal" "clean catch" sample method from oil pan drain:
Vacuum Pump on a hot engine:
Vacuum Pump on a cold engine:
Ignore the statement about "dropping the pan", I don't do this, I'm not sure where this statement comes from. When they called me to ask what the hell I was doing, in my explanation, I think they misinterpreted my comparison of "oil pan PLUG" versus "dipstick".
So there are differences, that much is clear, but they don't seem to be notable?? I'll let you decide for yourself if you think they are or not.
Much like the oil analysis themselves, I did this testing in sampling differences as much as not for an exercise in knowledge for myself versus trying to prove anything one way or another.
@Hellcatcfp
- 3
- 1
- 1
- Show All